September 8, 2007
They Did It Again: Fashion Magazine Slims Curvy America

They Did It Again: Fashion Magazine Slims Curvy America
They just can’t seem to help themselves. Fashion magazines, I mean. Schizophrenic messaging …… one minute they are celebrating women of all shapes and sizes, the next they are photoshopping [is that even a word?] a celebrity or model to shave off any signs of a real woman’s body. It’s as if they just can’t reconcile the need to sell magazines which requires bowing to a bit of public pressure and demand for more realistic body image and their own, silly concepts of beauty which only embraces one body type………the thinner the better, baby!
Glamour is the culprit this time. But we all know it could be any of them. September’s issue features the super-hot star of Ugly Betty, America Ferrera. Yay!… right? Well, maybe not. See the little photoshop elves in the art department, rubber stamped if not outright encouraged or directed by the Editor in Chief, worked a little of their digital diet magic. And poof! America is no longer a healthy size, what, 8? (She isn’t plus-size by anyone’s standards but Hollywood or fashion). She is now miraculously somewhere between the coveted fashionably sized 2 to 4 on that glossy magazine cover (see above, left compared to un-slimmed right image). Maybe they thought we wouldn’t notice.
What’s even funnier is that the tag for their on-line interview with the star states:
Now, did someone forget to watch Ugly Betty? Or are they just too dumb to get the message? How about The Devil Wears Prada? Nope, the irony in that one went flying over their heads too. Hmmm.
I thought maybe Glamour was starting to get it with spreads like this one back in April of 2007:


Plus Model Kailee O’Sullivan in Glamour, April 2007
I guess I was wrong. America - keep doing your thing. Ugly Betty, Real Women Have Curves, Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants….. they are all inspirational roles compared to the air-brushed ‘perfection’ these fashion magazine tout. And, oh…. take a page from Kate Winslet: raise holy hell over this manipulation of your already highly attractive body.
And for a little education - check out this link on fashion and digital image altering: If Looks Could Kill: Digital Manipulation of Fashion Models
So what do you think?
Did Glamour go too far? Or did America need some slimming to become “Hot”? And even if she did, do you think fashion, magazines and the media play a part in girls’ body image issues and maybe even a role in the rise of eating disorders? Is it ethical to digitally alter images to make celebrities and models thinner?
Popularity: 25% [?]






5 Comments on They Did It Again: Fashion Magazine Slims Curvy America »
September 8, 2007
Lisa @ 3:32 am:
OMG - how could they? She looks gorgeous in the untouched photo. What made them think she needed to look skinnier?
Pillau @ 5:19 am:
The sad thing is, there’s no way to win, because blog posts like this one are exactly what Glamour wants — free publicity (it gets more people talking about the magazine). They win either way — they get the aesthetic which they (gay men and Anna Wintour types) want, and if a few people complain about the severe digitual manipulation, so much the better — more publicity for them.
These magazines are rubbish through and through.
Moe @ 4:46 pm:
It looks like they stuck her head on someone else’s body.
September 22, 2007
LisaTopher @ 9:01 pm:
I LOVE THIS PICTURE!! [of Kailee O’Sullivan] I also love what it says next to it!! I hate skinny models on the runway. They don’t even dress in the everyday clothes that EVERYONE is really wearing. Thank you so much for putting this up. It made me realize that I’m pretty no matter how “chunky” I may be.
September 25, 2007
Arlette @ 2:56 pm:
They sure did skinny her up. I heard that Glamour is denying any photoshopping. Duh. Like, yeah her arms got skinnier overnight all on their own and she grew a longer neck. Thing is America ain’t plus to begin with, so why are they pushing a skinnier image. Bad Glamour.